Doomerism
Expecting or emphasizing negative outcomes, often related to AI's potential risks and societal impact.
Doomerism in AI means focusing on the worst possible outcomes that could come from artificial intelligence. It's like always thinking about the bad things that might happen, such as AI taking over jobs or even posing an existential threat to humanity.
For example, someone might express doomerism by saying that advanced AI will inevitably lead to widespread unemployment and societal collapse, and that we should stop developing it altogether.
Doomerism refers to a pessimistic outlook that emphasizes the potential negative consequences and existential risks associated with advanced AI development. This perspective often highlights scenarios such as uncontrollable superintelligence, mass job displacement, or the erosion of human autonomy.
It contrasts with more optimistic or pragmatic views that focus on AI's benefits or believe risks can be managed through careful development and regulation.
The term 'doomerism' is appearing in discussions about AI because of debates around AI safety and the pace of AI development. Some leaders are concerned that an overemphasis on potential negative outcomes could slow down progress, while others believe these concerns are valid and require careful consideration.
- Satya Nadella on the AI Doomer Slowdown, Microsoft’s Master Plan & Who Wins AIMicrosoft · All-In Podcast ·
- Microsoft Copilot
- Microsoft executives, including Satya Nadella, have discussed the concept of 'AI doomerism' in relation to the company's strategy and the broader AI safety conversations.
- Pessimism
- A general tendency to see the worst aspect of things or believe that
- Risk Aversion
- A preference for a sure gain over a risky but larger gain; in AI,
The term 'doomer' has a broader cultural context referring to someone who believes in inevitable doom. In the AI context, it's used to describe those who foresee catastrophic outcomes from artificial intelligence.
To explore concerns related to AI doomerism, try asking an AI model like ChatGPT or Gemini to list potential negative societal impacts of advanced AI. Then, ask it to list potential benefits and how risks might be mitigated. This contrast can highlight the spectrum of viewpoints.
The Playbook: reusable how-tos, prompts, configs and tips pulled out of the news.
- PromptRole-play a student struggling with math for AI tutor simulationSimulate a student's math struggles and uncertainty for AI tutor evaluation. · 5 min
- TemplateReusable workflow templates for healthcare teamsTeams can create and share templates for common workflows like documentation or prior authorizations. · 15 min
- TemplateTemplate for building an AI tool tailored to your workA structured approach to defining and building a custom AI tool for specific business needs. · 15 min
- TemplateEvals CSV prompt list for agent skillsA CSV file template for listing prompts used in evaluating agent skills. · 20 min
- HeuristicDouble coding agent task completion with docs linksProviding coding agents with a documentation link significantly increases their task completion rate. · 2 min
Questions people ask
- Is doomerism the same as being worried about AI?
- Doomerism is a more extreme form of worry, focusing specifically on catastrophic or existential negative outcomes from AI, rather than general concerns or risks.
- Does doomerism mean we should stop AI development?
- Doomerist viewpoints often advocate for slowing down or halting AI development due to perceived insurmountable risks. However, others argue for continued development with strong safety measures.
First seen on Subvolts Sep 15, 2026. Updated Sep 22, 2026. Written by an AI model from the items above and reviewed against them weekly; report an error.