GPT-6.1 Sol vs. Opus 5.5 for professional PDF document analysis

GPT-6.1 Sol outperforms Opus 5.5 on professional PDF analysis at less than half the cost.

ChatGPTParaphrased
Reasoning
On the GDP.pdf benchmark, which tests professional question answering using complex PDF documents, GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher than Opus 5.5 with fallbacks. It achieves this at less than half the cost per task across various reasoning settings, making it a more cost-effective solution for analyzing professional documents.
Options
  • GPT-6.1 Sol
  • Opus 5.5
Pick

GPT-6.1 Sol

What it does and when to use it

For tasks involving professional question answering using complex PDF documents like those found in finance and healthcare, GPT-6.1 Sol shows superior performance compared to Opus 5.5. Crucially, it achieves this at a significantly lower cost per task, offering a more economical solution for detailed document analysis.

Sources and credit

First seen on Subvolts Sep 30, 2026. Updated Oct 1, 2026. Spotted a problem? Tell us.

Where it shows up
Related in the PlaybookPlaybook →

The Playbook: reusable how-tos, prompts, configs and tips pulled out of the news.

Questions people ask

Which AI tools does this work with?
The sources used it with ChatGPT.
Where did this come from?
OpenAI Research (OpenAI Research). Subvolts collected, normalized and credited it; the link above opens the original.