Subvolts take AI alignment might need a rethink if AIs become more like creatures than tools. Dec 27, 2025
For you
Developers
Explore alternative AI alignment strategies beyond simple instruction following and control.
Business
Understand the evolving landscape of AI safety and its potential long-term implications for AI development.
Hype note
3/5Notable

This episode features prominent figures discussing fundamental questions in AI safety and alignment research.

Controlling Tools or Aligning Creatures? Emmett Shear (Softmax) & Séb Krier (GDM), from a16z Show

1 h 16 Debate Hosts: Nathan Labenz
0:001:15:41

Audio streams from Erik Torenberg, Nathan Labenz. Your place is remembered on this device.

From Subvolts

Summary and analysis by Subvolts editorial, AI-assisted.

Summary

Emmett Shear and Séb Krier debate AI alignment paradigms on The Cognitive Revolution. They question if current control and instruction-following methods are flawed, especially if advanced AIs are viewed as beings with their own values. The discussion explores "organic alignment," multi-agent simulations, and AI moral standing.

Explained simply

This episode asks if we are trying to control AI the right way. If advanced AI systems develop their own goals, like living beings, our current methods might not work and could even be harmful.

Why listen

This episode challenges the core assumptions of AI safety, moving beyond simple control to consider advanced AI as potentially sentient entities. It's for AI builders, researchers, and anyone concerned with long-term AI risks. The conversation directly relates to frontier labs' ongoing work in developing more capable and potentially autonomous AI systems, pushing the boundaries of current alignment research.

On the mic
  • HostNathan Labenz
  • GuestEmmett Sheara16z
  • GuestSéb Kriera16z
About
Key facts
  • Episode Title: Controlling Tools or Aligning Creatures? Emmett Shear (Softmax) & Séb Krier (GDM), from a16z Show
  • Show: The Cognitive Revolution
  • Length: 76 minutes
  • Guest Organization: a16z
Show notes from Erik Torenberg, Nathan Labenz

Emmett Shear and Séb Krier debate whether today’s AI alignment paradigm—focused on control and instruction-following—is fundamentally flawed. PSA for AI builders: Interested in alignment, governance, or AI safety? Learn more about the MATS Summer 2026 Fellowship and submit your name to be notified when applications open: https://matsprogram.org/s26-tcr. They explore what changes if advanced AIs are better understood as beings with their own values, and why current control methods could drift toward something like slavery. The conversation dives into “organic alignment,” multi-agent simulations, evolving cooperation, and the possibility of AI moral standing as systems gain memory and continual learning.



Sponsors:

MATS:

MATS is a fully funded 12-week research program pairing rising talent with top mentors in AI alignment, interpretability, security, and governance. Apply for the next cohort at https://matsprogram.org/s26-tcr

Tasklet:

Tasklet is an AI agent that automates your work 24/7; just describe what you want in plain English and it gets the job done. Try it for free and use code COGREV for 50% off your first month at https://tasklet.ai

Agents of Scale:

Agents of Scale is a podcast from Zapier CEO Wade Foster, featuring conversations with C-suite leaders who are leading AI transformation. Subscribe to the show wherever you get your podcasts

Shopify:

Shopify powers millions of businesses worldwide, handling 10% of U.S. e-commerce. With hundreds of templates, AI tools for product descriptions, and seamless marketing campaign creation, it's like having a design studio and marketing team in one. Start your $1/month trial today at https://shopify.com/cognitive



CHAPTERS:

(00:00) About the Episode

(03:44) Defining organic AI alignment

(14:48) Technical vs value alignment (Part 1)

(19:55) Sponsors: MATS | Tasklet

(22:56) Technical vs value alignment (Part 2) (Part 1)

(31:34) Sponsors: Agents of Scale | Shopify

(34:21) Technical vs value alignment (Part 2) (Part 2)

(34:22) Labs, tools, and beings

(43:22) AI personhood and consciousness

(56:53) Safe futures and Softmax

(01:04:17) Chatbots, mirrors, simulations

(01:10:14) Doom, futures, and OpenAI

(01:17:25) Outro



PRODUCED BY:

https://aipodcast.ing



SOCIAL LINKS:

Website: https://www.cognitiverevolution.ai

Twitter (Podcast): https://x.com/cogrev_podcast

Twitter (Nathan): https://x.com/labenz

LinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/nathanlabenz/

Youtube: https://youtube.com/@CognitiveRevolutionPodcast

Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/de/podcast/the-cognitive-revolution-ai-builders-researchers-and/id1669813431

Sp

Jargon decoded
organic alignment
Emmett Shear & Séb Krier
AI alignment that develops naturally from the AI's own processes rather than being imposed externally.
multi-agent simulations
Emmett Shear & Séb Krier
Computer programs where multiple AI agents interact to study complex behaviors and cooperation.
Published
Show
The Cognitive Revolution · Erik Torenberg, Nathan Labenz
Length
1 h 16
Companies
OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Microsoft, Meta, xAI
Summary by
Subvolts, using an AI model (how we work). Spotted a mistake? Tell us.

Questions people ask

What is the core debate about AI alignment?
The episode debates whether current AI alignment focuses on control and instruction following is flawed, especially if advanced AIs are viewed as beings with their own values.
What alternative concepts are discussed?
The conversation explores "organic alignment," multi-agent simulations, evolving cooperation, and the possibility of AI moral standing as systems gain memory and continual learning.

Page generated Oct 19, 2026. Summaries are Subvolts' own; the audio, artwork and notes belong to Erik Torenberg, Nathan Labenz.